luca
@fahrenheit
ML researcher, interested in math and probabilistic machine reasoning.
luca
Only the future can tell. But we need to mend our ways. Otherwise, nihilism will win and we will deconstruct ourselves into oblivion. Maybe this is will be the million dollar question of the next century. What do we do, when we do not have to do anything?
refinement | llct
A good way to understand linear transformations as functions on the basis of a space.
might be a cool derivation for math club
The paranoid fantasy behind Brexit | Brexit | The Guardian
amp.theguardian.com
probably the right way to understand the right in the Uk..
The risk in designing any personal knowledge system lies in the overemphasise of the acquisition system to the detriment of the review system. Acquisition can masquerade as work, but collecting without review is pseudo-work.
"Don’t think. Thinking is the enemy of creativity. It’s self-conscious, and anything self-conscious is lousy. You can’t try to do things. You simply must do things."
- Ray Bradbury
In the work with LLMs lies a deeper question, that I have not been able to answer for myself properly so far. I can use an LLM to extract information, summarise, distill, but it feels like I am fooling myself. The work that I have done is not done by me. I am have not made any connections in my brain. It feels like we should not use them for intell
... See moremoments are important theoretically because they provide an alternative way to fully and uniquely specify a probability distribution, a fact that is intuitive if you understand how moment’s quantify a distribution’s location, spread, and shape