
Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life

people’s funds or has a family to feed.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb • Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life
Volatile things are not necessarily risky, and the reverse is also true. Jumping from a bench would be good for you and your bones, while falling from the twenty-second floor will never be so.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb • Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life
and thinking introduces is the illusion that each one of us is a single unit.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb • Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life
ergodicity holds when a collection of players have the same statistical properties (particularly expectation) as a single player over time. Ensemble probabilities are similar to time probabilities. Absence of ergodicity makes the risk properties not directly transferable from observed probability to the payoff of a strategy subjected to ruin (or an
... See moreNassim Nicholas Taleb • Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life
Via Negativa: in theology and philosophy, the focus on what something is not, an indirect definition, deemed less prone to fallacies than via positiva. In action, it is a recipe for what to avoid, what not to do—subtraction, not addition, works better in domains with multiplicative and unpredictable side effects. In medicine, stopping someone from
... See moreNassim Nicholas Taleb • Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life
Never compare a multiplicative, systemic, and fat-tailed risk to a non-multiplicative, idiosyncratic, and thin-tailed one.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb • Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life
I can exercise courage to save a collection of kids from drowning, at the risk of my own life, and it would also correspond to a form of prudence. Were I to die, I would be sacrificing a lower layer in Figure 6 for the sake of a higher one.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb • Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life
In a strategy that entails ruin, benefits never offset risks of ruin.