Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
People v. Stock
Defendant appeals denial of pretrial release for aggravated battery. Court finds State failed to prove no conditions can mitigate threat, reversing trial court’s decision. Remanded for further proceedings.
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.netOn 23 March 2021 – as this book was going to press – the Supreme Court ruled (by three votes to two) that Lula had not been treated impartially by the Curitiba court.
Richard Lapper • Beef, Bible and bullets: Brazil in the age of Bolsonaro
So what is Loper Bright actually about?
Loper Bright overrules a Reagan-era Supreme Court decision known as Chevron v. National Resources Defense Council (1984), which held that when a federal statute delegating policymaking authority to an agency is ambiguous, courts typically should defer to the agency’s reading of that statute rather than trying ... See more
Loper Bright overrules a Reagan-era Supreme Court decision known as Chevron v. National Resources Defense Council (1984), which held that when a federal statute delegating policymaking authority to an agency is ambiguous, courts typically should defer to the agency’s reading of that statute rather than trying ... See more
People v. Boose
Lisa Boose appeals a ruling denying her credit under the County Jail Good Behavior Allowance Act after being sanctioned for violating a pretrial release condition under the Pretrial Fairness Act.
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.net
People v. Duckworth
The court dismissed the defendant's appeal challenging pretrial detention under the SAFE-T Act because the notice of appeal lacked proper arguments and support as required by the rules.
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.netPeople v. Lippert
The document discusses an appeal by the defendant, challenging the reimposition of monetary bail as a condition of pretrial release after the effective date of the SAFE-T Act.
ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.netHe holds that in a state of nature there is no right or wrong, for wrong consists in disobeying the law. He holds that the sovereign can do no wrong, and agrees with Hobbes that the Church should be entirely subordinate to the State. He is opposed to all rebellion, even against a bad government, and instances the troubles in England as a proof of t
... See more