Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
General Zhang Zhizhong
Gardner Bovingdon • The Uyghurs: Strangers in Their Own Land
Chiang loyalist Wu Zhongxin
Gardner Bovingdon • The Uyghurs: Strangers in Their Own Land
So long as the scholar-gentry aspired to bureaucratic advancement through the examination system, with its classical syllabus and Confucian ideology, and while China was governed from walled cities with an ultra-loyal Manchu army in reserve, rebellion was unlikely to spread far or last long. The early emperors also insisted upon frugal expenditure
... See moreJohn Darwin • After Tamerlane: The Rise and Fall of Global Empires, 1400-2000
Ming rule represented a vehement reaction against what was seen by its original supporters as the corruption, oppression and overtaxation of the Mongol Yuan.
John Darwin • After Tamerlane: The Rise and Fall of Global Empires, 1400-2000
The primary role of a Chinese emperor was to safeguard the frontier against the nomadic irruptions that threatened to wreck (physically and politically) his complex agrarian world.
John Darwin • After Tamerlane: The Rise and Fall of Global Empires, 1400-2000
According to Tu Wei-ming, even Dong Zhongshu, the Han dynasty scholar identified as the architect of official Confucianism, predicated his theory of cosmic correlation with earthly events on the assumption that the emperor harmonized his rule morally and ritually with the cosmic process. Outer kingliness could not be achieved without inner sageline
... See morePrasenjit Duara • The Crisis of Global Modernity: Asian Traditions and a Sustainable Future (Asian Connections)
Nassim Nicholas Taleb • Incerto 4-Book Bundle
Ming diplomacy was intended to secure the external conditions for internal stability. From that point of view, the famous voyages dispatched by the emperor Yung-lo around the Indian Ocean under the admiral Cheng-ho were an aberration, prompted perhaps by fear of attack by Tamerlane and his successors.
John Darwin • After Tamerlane: The Rise and Fall of Global Empires, 1400-2000
The China scholar William Callahan, who has launched a critique of Zhao’s conception, suggests that his conception of tianxia as a top-down project of bringing order to a chaotic or potentially chaotic world cannot be derived from the thinkers Zhao uses such as Laozi and Zhuangzi.