Sublime

At Ojai, in April, four hour-long discussions took place on ‘The Nature of the Mind’ between K, David Bohm, Dr John Hidley, a psychiatrist in private practice in Ojai, and Rupert Sheldrake, who was at that time a consultant to the International Crops Institute in Hyderabad. These discussions, video taped in colour, had been sponsored by the Robert

Jung seemed to have two minds about the supernatural: a public one that wanted to understand it “scientifically,” and a private one that acknowledged ghosts, visions, and premonitions as part of the essential mystery of life.

As flourishing shifted from societal to individual, people were free to find all sorts of ways to experience something spiritual inside the immanent frame. Taylor has called this “the nova effect,” meaning that all sorts of third ways between cold immanence and organized religion exploded. These unique third ways provided people with overarching me

the problem was that Freud’s perspective, and the social theory inspired by it, didn’t recognize that culture is never a whole. Rather, culture is always a patchwork of intuitions and practices.

Dans le lignage de la religion rationnelle, de l'édifice systématique, de la doctrine dogmatique, dominant dans l'histoire officielle de la pensée, Camus n'est peut-être pas philosophe ; mais dans le lignage de l'interrogation existentielle, de la vérité idiosyncrasique, de la pensée praticable, de la sotériologie démocratisée, il brille comme l'un