Sublime

Depuis Taylor, le choix des conditions de travail est laissé aux dirigeants et managers. Or, les travailleurs devraient participer à ces prises de décision, qui les concernent au premier chef. Ce pouvoir d’organisation du travail, qui leur a été ôté, peut être repris.

By their mid-30s, if a man maximizes his potential, she needs him more than he needs her. Whether he acknowledges this shift is irrelevant; her hindbrain is making the evaluation. Conversely, if it turns out she made a bad bet in her 20s by marrying a guy who never became high-value in his 30s, that’s when she exits the marriage – before she’s too

Pour Linhart, pour se débarrasser de ce rapport d’obéissance, il faut supprimer le lien de subordination au cœur du salariat qui permet à l’employeur de s’emparer du travail. Cela stimulerait la discussion sur la finalité du travail et son organisation puisque les salariés ne devraient plus seulement obéir à l’autorité hiérarchique.

Back in 1976, two economists, Michael Jensen and William Meckling, published a paper that has been committed to memory by those in the first camp. The paper, which has been one of the most widely cited of the past three decades, focused on a problem known as agency theory, or incentive theory: why don’t managers always behave in a way that is in th

It’s possible to build an organization where every worker is monitored at all times, where every job is sliced as thinly as possible and outsourced to the cheapest possible person. That organization can be centrally controlled, algorithmically managed, and brutal in the way it makes choices. The CEO might earn an hourly wage ten thousand times high