Sublime

An inspiration engine for ideas

AllPeopleCollectionsArticlesAudioBooksFilesHighlightsImagesLinksNotesTextTweetsVideos

Publication bias. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the scientific literature is full of positive results. Null or negative results have traditionally been hard to publish and are often relegated to abandoned hard drives, despite the fact that they represent valuable knowledge claims. Research users looking for evidence get a distorted view, which — like Joh... See more

An “Omics” Answer to the Replication Crisis

Instead, Professor Kahneman favored an alternative that he termed “adversarial collaboration.” When people who disagree work together to test a hypothesis, they are involved in a common endeavor. They are trying not to win, but to figure out what’s true. They might even become friends.

Cass R. Sunstein • Opinion | The Nobel Prize-Winning Professor Who Liked to Collaborate With His Adversaries

Berkson’s Paradox : Strong correlations can fall apart when combined with a larger population. Among hospital patients, motorcycle crash victims wearing helmets are more likely to be seriously injured than those not wearing helmets. But that’s because most crash victims saved by helmets did not need to become hospital patients, and those without h

Morgan Housel • 100 Little Ideas

Numerous psychological studies have found that we seek out information that supports our pre-existing views – and avoid information that might contradict them.

This cognitive bias can push people into more extreme ideological positions | BPS

The researcher may also look for disconfirming evidence. The process involves having the researcher first establish a theme and then look through all of the evidence for exceptions to this theme. This is evidence that presents an alternative explanation for a theme.

John W. Creswell • 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher

Rejecting the opposite of what we’re interested in seems like a lot of hoops to jump through. Why not just test the hypothesis that there is a difference between versions? The reason for this approach is at the heart of the scientific process of falsification. It’s very difficult to prove something scientifically.

Sublime

An “Omics” Answer to the Replication Crisis

Cass R. Sunstein • Opinion | The Nobel Prize-Winning Professor Who Liked to Collaborate With His Adversaries

Morgan Housel • 100 Little Ideas

This cognitive bias can push people into more extreme ideological positions | BPS

John W. Creswell • 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher

Jeff Sauro • Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research

Maura Ginty • Landing Page Optimization: The Definitive Guide to Testing and Tuning for Conversions

Lawrence Yeo • Speculation: A Game You Can’t Win