
⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy

how these technologies are fostering a new era of collaborative creation, characterized by unprecedented accessibility, real-time interaction, and a shared creative space.
Audrey Tang • ⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy
roughly half of the population over its lifetime and an average of 11,000 unique daily visitors.
Audrey Tang • ⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy
technologies (e.g., social media, cryptography, and some other financial technology) are seen to be breaking down the social fabric, heightening polarization, eroding norms, undermining law enforcement, and accelerating the speed and expanding the reach of financial markets to the point where they are unaccountable to democratic polities. We shall
... See moreAudrey Tang • ⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy
gone beyond symbolic support to awarding real funding to valued projects (such as around agricultural and food safety inspections) using an extension of Quadratic Voting to Funding
Audrey Tang • ⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy
Open-source projects: Some of the most ambitious creative collaborations take place in open-source co-edited projects like Wikipedia, where thousands co-create increasingly canonical content. Platforms like GitHub and GitLab facilitate similar codevelopment for software, while others like Hugging Face allow this for development of Generative Founda
... See moreAudrey Tang • ⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy
Polis is a prominent example of what leading ⿻ technologists Aviv Ovadya and Luke Thorburn call "collective response systems" and "bridging systems" and others call "wikisurveys".
Audrey Tang • ⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy
The demands of ⿻ identity systems supporting some of the above suggest that while voting in new transnational configurations is imaginable, systems of voting are unlikely any time soon to truly reach global legitimacy.
Audrey Tang • ⿻ 數位 Plurality: The Future of Collaborative Technology and Democracy
proposed having owners self-assess the value of their property under penalty of having to sell at this self-assessed value.[447]