Curiosity and Networks of Possibility

Or at least that is what we propose, and we have good reason for doing so. For while curiosity has largely been understood on the model of epistemic acquisition for millennia, other conceptual possibilities are buried in that same history.

It cannot be one thing, located in one place, practiced by one person, in the pursuit of one piece of information. But if not one, then what? What would it mean to rethink curiosity from a relational or even a network perspective? To take up the art of forming and fashioning the concept of curiosity anew?