
101 Things I Learned® in Law School

integrity of the system is more important than the truth of one case.
Vibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
As it could not be shown that the parties had agreed to the same thing, there was no meeting of the minds and therefore no binding contract. The court ruled that Wichelhaus did not have to pay for the cotton.
Vibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
Intent is the resolution to commit a crime.
Vibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
Rationality provides logical justification for a position, while passion provides a human connection to it. Both are needed to advance an argument; an abundance of one will
Vibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
Writing effectively isn’t recording the argument one wishes to make; it is a process of discovering what one’s argument needs to be. Through writing, thinking, researching, rewriting, rethinking, and rewriting again, an argument is discovered and clarified.
Vibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
Discrepancies between federal and state laws can present ethical dilemmas for a lawyer. State ethics rules for lawyers typically prohibit advising a client to violate the laws of the United States. But by advising a cannabis producer how to legally run his farm under state law, a lawyer may be advising the farmer to engage in criminal activity unde
... See moreVibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
Begin and end every argument or talking point with the thing you most want the listener to note or remember.
Vibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
Whether working from good or bad facts, or good or bad law, students need to show they can use their resources to convincingly support or refute a position.
Vibeke Norgaard Martin • 101 Things I Learned® in Law School
Even if others act poorly, you cannot use it as a reason to act poorly yourself.